Working with NumPy¶
You can use NumPy from Cython exactly the same as in regular Python, but by doing so you are losing potentially high speedups because Cython has support for fast access to NumPy arrays. Let’s see how this works with a simple example.
The code below does 2D discrete convolution of an image with a filter (and I’m
sure you can do better!, let it serve for demonstration purposes). It is both
valid Python and valid Cython code. I’ll refer to it as both
convolve_py.py for the Python version and
the Cython version – Cython uses ”.pyx” as its file suffix.
from __future__ import division import numpy as np def naive_convolve(f, g): # f is an image and is indexed by (v, w) # g is a filter kernel and is indexed by (s, t), # it needs odd dimensions # h is the output image and is indexed by (x, y), # it is not cropped if g.shape % 2 != 1 or g.shape % 2 != 1: raise ValueError("Only odd dimensions on filter supported") # smid and tmid are number of pixels between the center pixel # and the edge, ie for a 5x5 filter they will be 2. # # The output size is calculated by adding smid, tmid to each # side of the dimensions of the input image. vmax = f.shape wmax = f.shape smax = g.shape tmax = g.shape smid = smax // 2 tmid = tmax // 2 xmax = vmax + 2*smid ymax = wmax + 2*tmid # Allocate result image. h = np.zeros([xmax, ymax], dtype=f.dtype) # Do convolution for x in range(xmax): for y in range(ymax): # Calculate pixel value for h at (x,y). Sum one component # for each pixel (s, t) of the filter g. s_from = max(smid - x, -smid) s_to = min((xmax - x) - smid, smid + 1) t_from = max(tmid - y, -tmid) t_to = min((ymax - y) - tmid, tmid + 1) value = 0 for s in range(s_from, s_to): for t in range(t_from, t_to): v = x - smid + s w = y - tmid + t value += g[smid - s, tmid - t] * f[v, w] h[x, y] = value return h
This should be compiled to produce
yourmod.so (for Linux systems). We
run a Python session to test both the Python version (imported from
.py-file) and the compiled Cython module.
In : import numpy as np In : import convolve_py In : convolve_py.naive_convolve(np.array([[1, 1, 1]], dtype=np.int), ... np.array([,,], dtype=np.int)) Out : array([[1, 1, 1], [2, 2, 2], [1, 1, 1]]) In : import convolve1 In : convolve1.naive_convolve(np.array([[1, 1, 1]], dtype=np.int), ... np.array([,,], dtype=np.int)) Out : array([[1, 1, 1], [2, 2, 2], [1, 1, 1]]) In : N = 100 In : f = np.arange(N*N, dtype=np.int).reshape((N,N)) In : g = np.arange(81, dtype=np.int).reshape((9, 9)) In : %timeit -n2 -r3 convolve_py.naive_convolve(f, g) 2 loops, best of 3: 1.86 s per loop In : %timeit -n2 -r3 convolve1.naive_convolve(f, g) 2 loops, best of 3: 1.41 s per loop
There’s not such a huge difference yet; because the C code still does exactly what the Python interpreter does (meaning, for instance, that a new object is allocated for each number used). Look at the generated html file and see what is needed for even the simplest statements you get the point quickly. We need to give Cython more information; we need to add types.
To add types we use custom Cython syntax, so we are now breaking Python source compatibility. Consider this code (read the comments!)
from __future__ import division import numpy as np # "cimport" is used to import special compile-time information # about the numpy module (this is stored in a file numpy.pxd which is # currently part of the Cython distribution). cimport numpy as np # We now need to fix a datatype for our arrays. I've used the variable # DTYPE for this, which is assigned to the usual NumPy runtime # type info object. DTYPE = np.int # "ctypedef" assigns a corresponding compile-time type to DTYPE_t. For # every type in the numpy module there's a corresponding compile-time # type with a _t-suffix. ctypedef np.int_t DTYPE_t # "def" can type its arguments but not have a return type. The type of the # arguments for a "def" function is checked at run-time when entering the # function. # # The arrays f, g and h is typed as "np.ndarray" instances. The only effect # this has is to a) insert checks that the function arguments really are # NumPy arrays, and b) make some attribute access like f.shape much # more efficient. (In this example this doesn't matter though.) def naive_convolve(np.ndarray f, np.ndarray g): if g.shape % 2 != 1 or g.shape % 2 != 1: raise ValueError("Only odd dimensions on filter supported") assert f.dtype == DTYPE and g.dtype == DTYPE # The "cdef" keyword is also used within functions to type variables. It # can only be used at the top indentation level (there are non-trivial # problems with allowing them in other places, though we'd love to see # good and thought out proposals for it). # # For the indices, the "int" type is used. This corresponds to a C int, # other C types (like "unsigned int") could have been used instead. # Purists could use "Py_ssize_t" which is the proper Python type for # array indices. cdef int vmax = f.shape cdef int wmax = f.shape cdef int smax = g.shape cdef int tmax = g.shape cdef int smid = smax // 2 cdef int tmid = tmax // 2 cdef int xmax = vmax + 2*smid cdef int ymax = wmax + 2*tmid cdef np.ndarray h = np.zeros([xmax, ymax], dtype=DTYPE) cdef int x, y, s, t, v, w # It is very important to type ALL your variables. You do not get any # warnings if not, only much slower code (they are implicitly typed as # Python objects). cdef int s_from, s_to, t_from, t_to # For the value variable, we want to use the same data type as is # stored in the array, so we use "DTYPE_t" as defined above. # NB! An important side-effect of this is that if "value" overflows its # datatype size, it will simply wrap around like in C, rather than raise # an error like in Python. cdef DTYPE_t value for x in range(xmax): for y in range(ymax): s_from = max(smid - x, -smid) s_to = min((xmax - x) - smid, smid + 1) t_from = max(tmid - y, -tmid) t_to = min((ymax - y) - tmid, tmid + 1) value = 0 for s in range(s_from, s_to): for t in range(t_from, t_to): v = x - smid + s w = y - tmid + t value += g[smid - s, tmid - t] * f[v, w] h[x, y] = value return h
After building this and continuing my (very informal) benchmarks, I get:
In : import convolve2 In : %timeit -n2 -r3 convolve2.naive_convolve(f, g) 2 loops, best of 3: 828 ms per loop
There’s still a bottleneck killing performance, and that is the array lookups
and assignments. The
-operator still uses full Python operations –
what we would like to do instead is to access the data buffer directly at C
What we need to do then is to type the contents of the
We do this with a special “buffer” syntax which must be told the datatype
(first argument) and number of dimensions (“ndim” keyword-only argument, if
not provided then one-dimensional is assumed).
These are the needed changes:
... def naive_convolve(np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] f, np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] g): ... cdef np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] h = ...
In : import convolve3 In : %timeit -n3 -r100 convolve3.naive_convolve(f, g) 3 loops, best of 100: 11.6 ms per loop
Note the importance of this change.
Gotcha: This efficient indexing only affects certain index operations,
namely those with exactly
ndim number of typed integer indices. So if
v for instance isn’t typed, then the lookup
f[v, w] isn’t
optimized. On the other hand this means that you can continue using Python
objects for sophisticated dynamic slicing etc. just as when the array is not
Tuning indexing further¶
The array lookups are still slowed down by two factors:
Bounds checking is performed.
Negative indices are checked for and handled correctly. The code above is explicitly coded so that it doesn’t use negative indices, and it (hopefully) always access within bounds. We can add a decorator to disable bounds checking:
... cimport cython @cython.boundscheck(False) # turn off bounds-checking for entire function @cython.wraparound(False) # turn off negative index wrapping for entire function def naive_convolve(np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] f, np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] g): ...
Now bounds checking is not performed (and, as a side-effect, if you ‘’do’’ happen to access out of bounds you will in the best case crash your program and in the worst case corrupt data). It is possible to switch bounds-checking mode in many ways, see Compiler directives for more information.
Also, we’ve disabled the check to wrap negative indices (e.g. g[-1] giving the last value). As with disabling bounds checking, bad things will happen if we try to actually use negative indices with this disabled.
The function call overhead now starts to play a role, so we compare the latter two examples with larger N:
In : %timeit -n3 -r100 convolve4.naive_convolve(f, g) 3 loops, best of 100: 5.97 ms per loop In : N = 1000 In : f = np.arange(N*N, dtype=np.int).reshape((N,N)) In : g = np.arange(81, dtype=np.int).reshape((9, 9)) In : %timeit -n1 -r10 convolve3.naive_convolve(f, g) 1 loops, best of 10: 1.16 s per loop In : %timeit -n1 -r10 convolve4.naive_convolve(f, g) 1 loops, best of 10: 597 ms per loop
(Also this is a mixed benchmark as the result array is allocated within the function call.)
Speed comes with some cost. Especially it can be dangerous to set typed
h in our sample code) to
None. Setting such objects to
None is entirely
legal, but all you can do with them is check whether they are None. All
other use (attribute lookup or indexing) can potentially segfault or
corrupt data (rather than raising exceptions as they would in Python).
The actual rules are a bit more complicated but the main message is clear: Do not use typed objects without knowing that they are not set to None.
More generic code¶
It would be possible to do:
def naive_convolve(object[DTYPE_t, ndim=2] f, ...):
object rather than
np.ndarray. Under Python 3.0 this
can allow your algorithm to work with any libraries supporting the buffer
interface; and support for e.g. the Python Imaging Library may easily be added
if someone is interested also under Python 2.x.
There is some speed penalty to this though (as one makes more assumptions
compile-time if the type is set to
np.ndarray, specifically it is
assumed that the data is stored in pure strided mode and not in indirect